Deep whip wounds on Duterte
In the concrete situation of the Philippines at the present time, two main threats to the peace and security of the country are those coming, on the one hand, from the persistent Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army-National Democratic Front (CPP- NPA-NDF) and, on the other hand, the relentless maneuvers of the United States to drag the Philippines into war with China by intensifying the conflict in the South China Sea. It is a ploy that the United States must do to justify its military intervention in the Asean region.
Prior to the entry of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-Elcac), Communist terrorists wielded strong influence – in some cases real control – in most barangays across the country. And as retired Lieutenant-General Antonio Parlade Jr. discovered during his tenure as the task force spokesperson, Communist terrorists have infiltrated many influential sectors of Philippine society: academia, business, religion, the government itself for that matter if we are to consider Parlade’s assessment of the Makabayan bloc in Congress as legal fronts of the CPP-NPA.
In the South China Sea conflict, there were a number of incidents that almost made America’s ploy to make the country at war with China succeed.
On the one hand, remember the accidental ramming by a Chinese vessel of the Philippine fishing vessel Gemver-2 from Occidental Mindoro. News of the incident – which intriguingly erupted on the very day the country celebrated Independence Day – immediately stirred up anti-China protests across the country. The measures have even been reproduced elsewhere in the world by Loida Nicolas Lewis, who is said to be the richest Filipina outside the Philippines, who found a way with the American White House and who is said to be interested in digging for oil in the China Sea. southern. . It was the week the Philippines left off. All calm of MalacaÃ±ang. No word from President Duterte.
Are we at war with China? was everyone’s question.
And then at the end of the week, President Duterte broke his silence: “It was an accident.” Nothing more to fear.
It must be to the credit of President Duterte that at first glance, he has shown extreme restraint in handling the situation. It was said that he had had serious talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping to clarify matters and that they came to a peaceful agreement.
Now, the very day the Gemver-2 crash stunned the nation, which should come out in the media but a video showing the poor Filipino fishing boat rammed by a large steel vessel and identified as Chinese. It was evident that the video was aimed at stoking anti-Chinese rage among Filipinos.
An interesting observation about the video was that no one does such things in an instant. You shoot, edit visuals, add music and effects, record narration, etc. Now consider that ramming took place far in the South China Sea. How is a video supposed to describe the details of the actual collision – the crash of the Philippine boat, the fishermen thrown at the mercy of the elements, etc. just running in broadcast media?
In fact – and make any implication you can think of that – the reaction to then-US Ambassador Sung Kim’s incident aired alongside the media frenzy of the video; the envoy has already suggested that the Philippines could resort to the US-Philippine mutual defense treaty.
It was an impossible spectacle to accomplish without a single director. Who was this unique director? We throw the question to Maria Ressa. The video in question was a Rappler production – whose foundation is almost the only achievement recognized by the Nobel Peace Prize committee as Ressa’s credentials for the award.
Indeed, Ressa’s fame as a journalist stems in large part from the popularity Rappler has gained in reporting online. But the way the news site came into being has to be the biggest concern if it is to be objectively assessed.
Much has been said about his courage in reporting on Duterte’s drug war and the so-called âextrajudicial killingsâ that the war brought about, but as I always say, a journalist is only good if his editor allows him to do so. And it was revealed that Rappler was funded primarily by Pierre Morad Omidyar, a well-known American billionaire ranked 24th richest in the world, a tech entrepreneur and software engineer who since 2010 has been involved in online journalism as a head of an investigation. providing information service on reporting and public affairs. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Omidyar – cite_note-5) As a public opinion shaper, the social media mogul is reportedly actively involved in various US regime change operations here and there in the world. That he invests heavily in a news site in the Philippines at a time when President Duterte has openly announced his contempt for the United States must make his motive suspect. Omidyar’s virtual control over Rappler was confirmed by Securities and Exchange Commission records, prompting the government to initiate annulment proceedings against him; the Constitution prohibits the ownership of media by foreigners. But obviously having sound legal advice, Ressa, in defense, resorted to converting Filipino deposit receipts from Omidyar to Rappler into a donation, thereby circumventing the law. But she couldn’t get around the fact that Omidyar did and did indeed possess Rappler – for a minion can in no way triumph over his master – and Ressa’s displayed journalistic bravado cannot be as true as Omidyar would allow. For President Duterte, an opinion he categorically expressed in an interview with an American journalist, Rappler is a creation of the âCIA and the United Statesâ.
Is it any wonder then that Rappler was lightning fast in streaming the video of the Gemver-2 ramming online? It certainly advanced the US ploy to create feud between China and the Philippines and for a while the two appeared on the verge of a real showdown. Imagine the horror that would have arisen if Presidents Duterte and Xi had not come to an understanding peacefully.
Why, Ressa received the Nobel Peace Prize for the potential of war!
This is where something has almost always been irregular with the Nobel Peace Prize. Although it has been a cherished noble heritage of the Norwegian people, it is noted that it has not been without a strong pro-American political bias. Two of its first recipients were Theodore Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman, successive US Presidents during World War II, allegedly for their efforts to end the war. A popular belief is that America did not enter this war until after the devious Japanese bombardment of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, but communications between Roosevelt and the aspiring British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (Neville Chamberlain was Prime Minister when war began to break out in Europe) confirm that the United States was in the fray of World War II as early as 1938, albeit clandestinely, by selling war material to both sides of the conflict. But then it’s formally true; it is only when America is directly affected that it goes to war. For this reason, in cases where America has to hit someone already but someone doesn’t hit them first, she ventures into false flags, like the sinking of the USS Maine in 1898 to trigger the Spanish-American War or the Gulf of Tonkin incident. to justify his attack on Vietnam in 1964, or for that matter, the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center Twin Towers which enraged the American public so that President George Bush would have no problem attacking Iraq and to crush Saddam Hussein.
But to date, what may be the biggest achievement of the United States in this regard has been its success in getting then-Soviet Premier Mikhail Gorbachev to dismantle the otherwise awe-inspiring indestructibility of the Soviet sphere. during the Cold War period. With his glasnost and perestroika, Gorbachev overthrew the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), of which he was General Secretary, and thus brought down the entire Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in just one time.
It was 1991, when George W. Bush proclaimed to the world America’s final victory in the Cold War.
But that’s not the end of the story. In 1990, a year earlier, Gorbachev had been named the Nobel Peace Prize laureate that year. The quote for his award was: âConfrontation has been replaced by negotiations. The old European nation states have regained their freedom. The arms race is slowing down and we see a defined and active process in the direction of arms control and disarmament. “
Gorbachev received the Nobel Peace Prize for an achievement of the peace that was yet to come!
Well, he must have sold to Americans long before he sent his regime to collapse in 1991.
For the effort, he got the cash prize of $ 700,000. There are reports that this enabled him to buy a house in the United States. One writer wondered if that was how much was the 73 years of the Soviet Union’s existence. Some of this money was reported to be what Gorbachev used to set up the newspaper Novaya Gazeta, which is editor-in-chief Dmitry Muratov, Ressa’s co-winner for the Nobel Peace Prize who brought it to life. also obtained for criticizing the government. of America’s nemesis, Russia.
Given that Ressa won the Nobel Peace Prize primarily for his war against President Duterte, I shudder at possibilities such as what Gorbachev did to America’s satisfaction.
(To be concluded tomorrow, October 17, 2021)